Arnold Council Votes Down Acceptance of Harassment Investigation

On a 5-to-3 vote, the Arnold City Council decided against entering into public record the independent investigation on the harassment of a city employee by a councilman.

The Arnold City Council has voted against accepting into public record the independent investigation regarding a city employee's complaint about a hostile work environment.

. Boone says the harassment began after Moss' sister was fired from the Parks Department in 2010.

In October, the city hired Protective & Investigative Services to investigate the complaint. The investigation cost Arnold $6,800, according to a spokeswoman from the city's Finance Department. 

See previous articles: 

  • Arnold Employee Files Harassment Complaint Against Councilman

At the last council meeting, the discussion about the investigation began with Ward 3 Councilman Paul Freese making a motion to put an item on the January meeting agenda to censure Moss with provisions which were not discussed.

“The Moss investigation has been conducted, and we’ve all had a chance to review this investigation," Freese said. "There’s three things that we can do. We can do nothing, which isn’t the right thing to do. We can call for impeachment, which would be a public hearing, which I don’t think is our job to do that. That leaves us with one alternative, and that is censure."

Ward 2 Councilman Bill Moritz said he thought the council was getting ahead of itself and felt it needed to acknowledge and accept the investigation as public record. He asked Freese to withdraw his motion, which he did.

Then Moritz made a motion to accept the investigative report into public record. Allison Sweeney, who served as the acting city attorney at the meeting, advised Moss to recuse himself from the vote.

“Last I heard, this was a Boone investigation,” Moss said. “She filed the complaint. It’s an investigation on that, not on me. I will not be recusing my vote.”

The motion failed on a 5-to-3 vote. Moss, Ward 4 Councilwoman Sandra Kownacki, Ward 2 Councilwoman Michelle Hohmeier and Ward 1 Councilwomen Doris Borgelt and Cricky Lang cast the opposing votes.

Borgelt said everything in the report seems like hearsay. She also pointed out that several people who weren't subjects of the investigation were brought into question in the investigation.

"I didn’t see anything in it that was directly said to anyone, except to one employee who was not involved in any charges that were made,” Borgelt said. “I propose that this investigation was a sham.”

Mayor Ron Counts disagreed with Borgelt, saying the investigation was the “correct thing to do for our personnel.” 

Kownacki said she felt the investigator used leading questions to get the answers he wanted to hear and added she was pulled into the investigation over an overheard conversation she had about her daughter. 

Moss said he has yet to see a copy of the original complaint made to the Missouri Commission on Human Rights and wondered if it even existed.

“This entire investigation was a wild goose chase,” Moss said. “It’s ridiculous it took place.”

After the vote, Moss’ attorney, Chet Pleban, addressed the council. He placed doubt on the credibility of the city's choice in investigators and said the report shows Moss and himself refusing to answer questions, which wasn't entirely accurate.

“...when we appeared, we said, all right—what are you doing? What is your job?," Pleban said. "What this man told us was that he was investigating a complaint that was purportedly filed with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights by Ms. Boone."

During the interview, Pleban said he asked to see the complaint. “He (the investigator) didn’t have any complaint that was filed," Pleban said. “We checked with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, and lo and behold, there was no complaint filed..."

Boone told the investigator she had filed the complaint with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights in late September. In her interview with the independent firm, she said the commission had responded that it could do nothing with the complaint because it was not within its realm, and advised her to take the complaint to another agency. 

The original complaint to the commission was not included in the investigative report. 

Patch called and emailed the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to ask if the commission had received the complaint and to inquire about getting a copy. The call was not returned.

Patch also tried contacting Boone, Police Chief/Acting City Administrator Robert Shockey and City Attorney Bob Sweeney to inquire about getting a copy of the complaint. Boone and Shockey were out of the office this week, and Sweeney did not return the call.

Patch will provide more details on the complaint when and if they become available. 

Bob Hohmeier December 28, 2012 at 04:52 PM
Actually, Mr Pleban and his investigation is being done at no cost to the city or taxpayers. There was never a valid complaint filed with the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations so that's why none was provided to the Patch.
Doris Borgelt December 28, 2012 at 05:07 PM
Pleban is not the city's attorney. That would be Bob Sweeney. Juanita, the question is how much has Bob Sweeney been paid in addition to what the "investigator" is charging for his investigation? I can pretty much guarantee it will be more than that! He billed us $17,000 last month alone investigation my questions, allegations and complaints. Evidently no one makes a move without consulting him first! I want to know how it was said the investigation was going to be $2,000-$2,500. Then this firm (who only has a PO Box for an address) charges us an additional $4300 for the results???? Sounds like bait and switch to me. We'll give you that blood test for $50, but to get the results its going to cost you another hundred....yeah, right.
Matt Hay December 28, 2012 at 05:50 PM
Juanita, you mean Bob Sweeney? The City of Arnold's "Attorney"? Pleban is a private Attorney, who is representing Ken Moss. Your question presumes that Bob Sweeney was not fully involved in this entire charade, alongside Mayor Ron Counts, and Interim City Administrator/Police Chief Robert Shockey. This was all an orchestrated attempt to boot Moss and install Butch Cooley in his place. What this is, is collusion to commit conspiracy, and Shockey is going to be the one they toss in front of the bus for it, which is why he has already retained legal counsel for the whole matter. He sees the light and hears the horn, and knows his pension is in jeopardy for the stunt. This has gone further than they had planned, and they are flying blind. I am going to laugh my rear off when the Feds become involved, if they have not already, they are always slow to move. My guess is there is something they want to use Eminent Domain for, but know Moss will not go for it, so they need to replace him with a friendly vote.
Robert Jones December 28, 2012 at 06:09 PM
It seems like Arnold local goverment or should I say Gustapo is just as crooked as Fox School Dist. Both ars a bunch of crooks and I guess if you Harass someone in Arnold nothing will be done or is that one of the perks of the Job.
Doris Borgelt December 28, 2012 at 06:53 PM
Robert Jones there was no actionable harassment or retaliation claim as evidenced by the Missouri Commission on Human Rights saying that only discriminatory acts qualify under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Council is allowed to ask questions as to how things are being done by staff. Council is allowed to question decisions and request material and paperwork from staff, It is called accountability. Don't you want someone to watch out for taxpayer dollars to see that they are not wasted as they have been in this case? I


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »